in the world of drag racing
The latest update as of December 6, 1998
Ever get the feeling that you've entirely missed the point?!?
What the heck does that cartoon have to do with anything? I'm still
not sure, but the answer will come to me hopefully . . . before the end of
this update. It's been almost a week since the last news in this corner, but
I've been sick most of that time and just haven't felt up to doing much of
anything. However, I did spend more than a few hours going through the entire
Hot Links file and dropping in on all 535 sites
currently listed . . . and trying to reach a few dozen more that have disappeared
since the last update of that page.
During my cyberspace travels, more than once I felt like reaching for
another barf-bag as what I kept finding was enough to make one retch at times.
What a wasteland of mediocrity, bad taste, bad design, bad spelling, bad grammar
and just plain badness.
When I first joined the internet community nearly a year ago, the world
wide web seemed like a shiny new toy. For the first few months I happily
surfed around blindly, following every link I could find, trying to find
everything that was out there. As time went on though, the "shiny" wore off
and I began to look at the web with a slightly more critical view. And as my
own website began to take shape and improve, I found myself venturing into
the unknown less and less.
While there are certainly more undiscovered "treasures" out there,
waiting for me to find them, and more being constructed every day, my travels
have devolved to the point where, apart from the occasional visit to see if
anything has happened lately at some sites, I find myself only visiting about
20 sites on a regular basis. Gee, that great big web got a lot smaller in a
hurry, didn't it?
The plain truth is that most of the websites connected to drag racing
have very little content, are very poorly constructed and do absolutely nothing
to encourage a return visit. Some of the sites that I checked earlier this
week had not been updated at all this year, in fact some hadn't been touched
for nearly two years. Like many aspects of modern life, the web has a very
high "refresh" rate and if it doesn't move forward quickly and regularly,
then interest for the public fades just as quickly. Today's hot topic is simply
tomorrow's old news. Andy Warhol's "fifteen seconds of fame" is rapidly becoming
the web's "fifteen nano-seconds of fame".
What right do I have to criticize anyone's efforts though? Didn't
everyone of those websites take some effort and time and money to create?
Just like at the track, we can't all run a Top Fuel car (much as we'd all
like to, right?), the same as we can't all be the next
Horsepower Heaven. But, just
like at the track, there is no excuse for showing up with a tired, old, primered
beater instead of something with fresh paint, some go-fast parts and generally
a piece that you can be proud of. And going slower every week, (metaphorically
speaking) instead of going faster, is definitely not the way to go.
So, for all you webmaster "wanna-be's" or those who've put together
something and just let it die of boredom, here's my personal TOP TEN Pet
Peeves on the Internet list. They're not in any particular order, but are
simply a collection of the elements that turn me off -- big-time. And if you
can see some of the "attributes" of your site on this list, don't come bitching
to me about it, get off your butt and fix your mess . . . then complain
about me unfairly slagging your "effort". NO, I'm not going to put together
a list of the ten worst sites on the net (at this time) but believe me,
it would be a lot longer than ten . . .
I've seen every glaring, clashing, poor taste, unwatchable, hard-on-the-eyes
background in the universe during my travels. Almost every "home-made" site
on the net uses the worst possible combination of backgrounds and font colours
to drive people away as fast as their mouse can click. Ever heard the phrase,
"Less is More" folks? You've got to put something up for a background (grey
gets old in a real hurry) but why not go with something simple and light that
doesn't detract from the text and graphics? Yeah, black is the cool colour
of the late nineties, but in MODERATION . . . Please!
- FONTS - COLOURS
This complaint is part and parcel of the previous "bitch". Combining bad
backgrounds with unreadable text in colours that virtually disappear into the
background . . . quite a combination, eh? Like putting together a 500 cid
Brad Anderson fathead motor . . . with a 750 cfm carb on top. Ever hear
the word "consistency" too? While I'm far from a "design" expert, one of the
basics of good design is CONSISTENCY.
Changing fonts (typefaces) every few lines, not to mention the chaotic colour changes that seem to go with them,
just makes the viewer work that much harder to get the message. (Assuming you
have any message to convey -- another foreign concept at many websites). As
for spelling, grammar and punctuation . . . well, that's a whole 'nother topic.
Did anybody go to school and learn any of this stuff? Presumably, but the
lack of literary skills displayed all too frequently on the web is simply
Flavour of the year -- last year that is. In professional hands they can be
useful for tying together varied elements on a page and making navigation
more convenient. The majority (it seems) of sites employing them don't seem
to have a clue (or even care) how ugly and obtrusive they look. Nothing, well
almost nothing except for the first two items on this "bitch" list, turns me
off faster than a site that seems to be constructed almost entirely with frames.
(NOTE: I don't have Internet Explorer 4 or Netscape Navigator 4 or a 15" or
17" monitor, but neither does everybody on the net. Maybe with those upgrades,
frames wouldn't look so bad . . . but somehow I doubt it).
- POP-UP WINDOWS
Tricks are for kids and so are "pop-ups". Forget 'em, if you haven't got something
on the front page that grabs people's attention, then no amount of pop-ups is
going to keep them. Not to mention the hassle of "killing" them so you can
see what you came looking for in the first place. Thankfully this plague has
not descended on too many drag racing sites . . . yet.
- JAVA SCRIPT
Yeah, very trendy. What "business" are we in? Putting together "cool"
websites or functional websites? You can have both, but just like all the
other bells and whistles that are used to disguise a lack of content, no amount
of java is going to make a dog into a pony. Not to mention the fact that most
of the "scripts" have errors that cause big, ugly, noisy windows to pop-up
announcing the error. Best analogy for this that comes to mind is the moron
driving down the freeway in the fastlane with his left-turn signal on . . .
I keep hearing the words "I'm stupid, I'm stupid, I'm stupid" every time it
- LINK & BANNER EXCHANGES
This could be sub-titled "how to make your site look like CRAP in a few easy
steps". Let's ignore how long some of these atrocities take to ooze onto the
screen, let's forget how they clash and detract from the content, let's just
ask what the heck are they doing there? Of course, I still wonder why people
willingly pay for t-shirts that advertise somebody's product. I don't go
shopping for clothes too often (ANYBODY who knows me would testify to
that), but everytime I venture into the stores, I'm amazed at how big the
LOGOS have become on every item of apparel you can think of. What a great
marketing concept . . . people pay for the stuff and then go out and advertise
it for us for free - it's a win-win deal all the way. Yeah, for everyone but
the shmoe who's paid for the right to promote the product. Simply put, if
they haven't EARNED the right to be there, what are those banners
doing on your page??
- "FREE" SITES
Hope you're all sitting down to read this one. There is NO SUCH THING AS FREE.
If it's "free" how much is it really worth? If an internet service provider
is offering "free web space" do you really think its free? For those who don't
have a website, do you have any idea how quickly 1 or 2 or 5 or even 10 MB
of server space gets filled? Quicker than you can upload a dozen high-resolution
photographs, a few banners and logos and a page or two of content.
Then where do you go? Oh, for only -fill in the blank- per month we can
give you your own "virtual" website. With an "address" so long that Einstein
would go nuts trying to follow it. Of course, these free sites usually
come with a "wizard" to set up the page, so even if you know nothing about
HTML code, you can be a webmaster in a few easy keystrokes. And embarass
yourself in public.
- "UNDER CONSTRUCTION"
Yeah, right!! Okay, I'll admit it, I've had those banners on some pages on
my site for a while, in a few cases way too long, but if they're still up six
months after the site goes on-line . . . I've got to wonder whether the creator
has either died, moved to another continent, gone bankrupt, or what? The
"under construction" ploy only works for a short time, don't try and stretch
it or no one will believe you when you say the site is really up and alive.
- LACK OF CONTENT
The original premise of the internet was the display and exchange of information.
Get it?? INFORMATION. If you haven't got anything to say, then why are
you wasting my time (and yours) cluttering up the internet. Three pictures of
your 13-second GM-whatever and two lines of text under each photo and two
lame links to ... oh, let's say .... NHRA and the local library do not a website
make. If that's all you can provide in the way of content, then just forget
it until you've got something useful to provide, something that somebody other
than close friends and relatives could spend more than 10 seconds viewing.
Of course, there are those that go right off the deep end in the other direction;
telling us their life-story in excruiating detail ...last Tuesday, I had
a Ham on Rye for lunch, then a Pepto-Bismol for a chaser . . .. Try spending
a little time actually thinking about what people might want to see on your
site and then sit down, stretch your fingers and start creating something.
- STALE - OUT OF DATE
Like I said earlier in this update, nothing gets old faster than content on
the "net". If you want any return visitors, you've got to have something to
bring them back . . . BUT, if you don't have anything new or nothing's changed
three months later, that first return visit will be their last. I got quite
a chuckle out of sites that promised "regular" updates during the year, then
didn't do anything. Oh sure, some had the results from the first race or two,
or three, but then they just gradually ground to a halt. When the reality of
how much work it is to keep things moving ahead sinks in, some poeple just
give up and find another hobby. Or maybe they're just too busy. Well folks,
if you're "too busy" why did you ever think you had enough time to "do" a
website in the first place? Do it right, or don't even bother.
Whew, what a bunch of nasty words about websites. You might well ask,
"Who the hell is he to criticize anyone else's site when his own is pretty
lame in many respects?" I'm not claiming (far from it) to be anything remotely
resembling an "expert" at this game, but in the eleven months or so I've been
working on the NORTHERN THUNDER website, I feel I've learned a bit about how
it's supposed to be done.
Not to say that I've exhibited any of that, yet, but I feel that I'm getting
there . . . slowly. Maybe if I invested some money in a "turn-key" program
like FrontPage, PageMill, HotMetalPro, etc., then I could get there a lot
quicker. But that's not my style. I'd rather create everything from scratch,
actually writing all the HTML "code" by hand and trying to understand what's
going on as I'm doing it.
That's enough "web whining" for now, let's move on to some DRAG
RACING News. While the only race in North America this weekend is
taking place in perpetually (?) sunny Florida - the Snowbird Nationals (wonder
if they're sponsored by the "Greater Miami Coke Dealers Association"?), the
downunder racing season was active on two fronts.
Out on the West Coast at Perth's Ravenswood Raceway, the Golden State
Championships featured the 2nd Round of the Australian Top Doorslammer
Championships. Victor Bray was the star from the start of qualifying
and won the event to begin his run towards a possible fourth consecutive
season championship. (The 1st round of the series, scheduled for Calder Park
on Nov. 28th, was rained out and has not been rescheduled).
Claiming Low ET and Top Speed honours with 6.54 - 227.27 performances
in the hot and humid conditions, Bray gained maximum points with his final
round victory over local driver Dave Simpson. The "dark horse" entry of
Gary Phillips, yes, the defending Top Alcohol (dragster) champion in a
Perth-based Top Doorslammer, failed to materialize as problems during qualifying
led to his withdrawl from the event. For further details on the meet, visit
our NEW Race Report index.
Action was even hotter on Saturday night at Melbourne's Calder Park,
site of the Victorian Championships featuring the 2nd Round of the
Australian Top Fuel Championships. Making the action even hotter was the
$50,000 bonus posted by Calder owner Bob Jane for the first 300 mph
run in Australia. The bonus is still in "Uncle Bob's" pocket as no one produced
the magical number, although Darren DiFilippo came closest at 298.40,
but the bonus is now increased to $100,000 for the Australian
Nationals, scheduled for March 18-20 at Calder. If the 300 barrier is broken
beforehand, at Willowbank's New Year Series, the bonus goes out the window,
but top speeds have never been that great at the "Bank", so the money seems
safe until March.
More details on the Calder meet as soon as we get them; At the moment
we don't even know who won the race, but we'll give you the "goods" as soon
as we can. And next weekend we will have the details of the 3rd round of the
Top Doorslammer series being run at Adelaide International Raceway on Saturday,
December 12. Stay tuned for all the news.
More news as it happens, and if you wish to provide us with any news or information
to upgrade or correct any errors at this site: